The original question was:

"how can I make the netbios over Internet except the dlsw+ ?"

He didn't say bridging. You did.

Priscilla

At 01:29 PM 4/8/02, Jay wrote:
>This thread has been taken out of context.   The real initial question
>was whether or not you could bridge over the internet.  E.g., have 2
>LANs that are Layer 2 Bridged over the internet.  Somewhat like DLSw+
>can do for NetBIOS and SNA.   It would have the same effect as doing
>this: (which you can't do)
>
>int tunnel0
>  tun sour 10.10.10.1
>  tun dest 10.20.20.1
>  bridge-group 1
>
>int eth0
>  bridge-group 1
>
>Somehow IP would have to encapsulate the incoming MAC frame as the data
>portion of the packet, and then release it as an ethernet frame on the
>other end.
>
>
>
>On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 12:58, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> > NetBEUI is non-routable. NetBIOS is routable. NetBIOS over TCP/IP should
> > supposedly work over the Internet. For example, can't you do file sharing
> > over the Internet? That uses NetBIOS and SMB of CIFS.
> >
> > (I'm a Mac person, but in theory it should work. ;-)
> >
> > Priscilla
> >
> > At 10:43 AM 4/8/02, Jay wrote:
> > >Is it possible to send nonroutable traffic through a GRE Tunnel?
> > >
> > >On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 10:12, Engelhard M. Labiro wrote:
> > > > How about NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NBT) and encapsulate
> > > > it with IPSec.  Another idea is using a GRE tunnel to
> > > > pass the NetBIOS to the next hop.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I don't think you can, besides bridging on every internet hop.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 23:14, cage wrote:
> > > > > > how can I make the netbios over Internet except the dlsw+ ?
> > ________________________
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > http://www.priscilla.com
________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40843&t=40784
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to