At 01:50 PM 4/30/02, Patrick Ramsey wrote: >what? Steven, what problem are you trying to solve?? Where are you trying to separate this traffic? I think we may need to see a logical topology of sorts.
Also, I don't want to sound like a broken record, but I'm still wondering if you are trying to isolate IPX traffic rather than fixing the IPX network. Believe it or not, fixing it might be easier. In addition to the advice in other messages, here's one other thing to check for with IPX: A lot of implementations default to using all four frame types. I have seen both PCs and printers send broadcasts using Ethernet II, 802.3, 802.2, and SNAP! That's something to check for when trying to reduce IPX traffic. There's probably other things you can do too..... Priscilla >Now you've compeltely lost me! > >do you want to tunnel ipx and route to various vlans? > >I mean... If you have ipx on 1 interface and ip on the other, and they are >on the same vlan, then you're done. But they won't route between the two >because they are two different protocols. > >If you want them on two separate vlans and want to route between them, then >you're back to square 1 and you have to place ipx and ip on on interfaces. > >-Patrick > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 04/30/02 01:20PM >>> >One more thing, if I can tag IP and IPX, how do I route between the 2 vlans >if one is IP and the other IPX? > > >""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > That's exactly what I was looking for, but can you tag IPX. I kept >thinking > > that you could only tag IP. Now that I think of it, tagging is L2, so I > > could tag it, couldn't I? > > > > > > ""Chuck"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > in the old days of vlan switching, there was serious discussion of using > > > vlans to separate traffic by protocol. set up ports 1,3 and 5 as IP and > > > ports 2,4, and 6 as IPX. More importantly, put all those renegade > > AppleTalk > > > users on their own VLAN so their traffic doesn't bother people with real > > > work to do ( ;-> ) I don't know if there is serious talk of this any > > more. > > > > > > Is this kinda what you had in mind? > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > > ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > What are some good ways to separate IP and IPX traffic on a LAN? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > Get in my head: > > > > http://sar.dynu.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and >/or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, >Inc. ("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom >addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be >privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If >the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that any unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or >copying of any information from this email is strictly prohibited, and may >subject you to criminal and/or civil liability. If you have received this >email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and then delete this >email and its attachments from your computer. Thank you. > >================================================================ ________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42915&t=42855 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
