I'm not really sure what your getting at here... If you configure a machine address to be 192.168.0.2/24 you are using subnet zero, whereas if you configure a machine with an address of 192.168.0.241-254/28 you are not. If you mean configure the PC with an address of 192.168.0.240/28 then that would be a valid test of subnet zero using VLSM.
----- Original Message ----- From: "R. Benjamin Kessler" To: Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:43 PM Subject: RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] > Try configuring your machine(s) with addresses in the following > networks: > > 198.62.0.0/28 - e.g. 192.168.0.1-14 > and > 192.168.0.240/28 - e.g. 192.168.0.241-254 > > This would be utilizing the "all-zeros" and "all-ones" subnets of > 192.168.0.0/24 > > You tested configuring machines in the *networks* 192.168.0.0/24 and > 192.168.255.0/24 - not subnets of 192.168.0.0/16 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Michael L. Williams > Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 11:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] > > I have successfully used both an "all-zeros" and an "all-ones" subnet on > Windows 9x. (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.255.0/24) Works fine. > > Mike W. > > "Kazan, Naim" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Ok, now that we know the answer to that question? Will windows support > > subnets 0-255. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47759&t=47670 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
