For the folks who have tis up and running-- what tools, if any, are being used to make sure the VOIP service is operating at the desired level (delay and jitter bounds within spec, call cut-offs within spec, etc.)
Thanks Brad Ellis wrote: > > I setup call mangler for us to replace our analog system. It's been pretty > much a work horse for the past 5 months. From my experience, it's a pain in > the butt to set it up, but if you set it up right, it's awesome. I cant say > enough good things about it (after it's setup...the setting up part sucks) > We did a straight out full replace (but we only have 6 or so phones and 4 > analog lines to deal with). If you have more than 15 phones, I'd go with a > planned parallel migration route. Just my thoughts > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) > > ""Naomi James"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > We are thinking about getting Cisco's IP Telephony equipment. Is anyone > > using it. If so, can you tell me your thoughts about it (success/failure > > stories). Did it replace your phone lines or run in paralell? Are you > > still able to make 800 and 911 calls with the IP phones. > > > > Thanks for any information. > > > > Naomi James > > Computer Services and Information Technology > > Savannah State University > > 912-356-2509 > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name > of > > Mabelt.gif] > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name > of > > Mabelb.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48689&t=48673 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
