Eric, Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my part entering the information in the posting. The map-list in the router does have the correct IP address. I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on the "NEW SITE" router/map list without any success. I apologize, I should have stated that in my previous posting.
I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF process, but no success. THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" but eventually shows as being down. Also, I receive a message on the "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. Thank You for your assistance.. -----Original Message----- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] Hi, The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for site B yet configured. Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so under OSPF you will neighbor statements. HTH, Erick --- Bill Smith wrote: > Greetings, > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > Circuit. Currently, > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > submitted an order to add > another site into the cloud. The telco provided the > vpi's but only two > sites communicate. > > > Site C > | > | > | > Site A----------- ATM CLOUD ------------Site B > | > | > | > NEW Site > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > Site" was added but > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate with > Site A. Teloc has > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > Which brings up another > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > New site > Originating Destination > 90 90 > 100 100 > 80 80 > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > ends,,Does this sound > correct? > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > and site a exchange > info. > > Site A > interface ATM5/0/0 > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > ip pim sparse-mode > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap > atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap > atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 5 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 6 broadcast > > > > NEW Site > interface ATM3/0 > ip address 192.68.135.68 255.255.255.240 > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 95 95 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 broadcast > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > > Site C > interface ATM1/0/0 > ip address 192.68.135.65 255.255.255.240 > ip ospf authentication-key 7 010007097B0A0B4F > ip ospf network non-broadcast > map-group TEST > atm pvc 1 40 40 aal5snap > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > atm pvc 3 37 60 aal5snap > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > map-list TEST > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 3 > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > Any help is greatly appreciated! [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===== "Those who are willing to trade freedom for security deserve neither freedom nor security." -- Benjamin Franklin __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55241&t=55238 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
