Bill, No problem. Well, lets start by trying to ping sites a, b and C from the new sites router console/telnet session. This way the ping is direct. If were able to do this then the PVC and map-list entries are correct.
If the above doesn't work, then you'll need to verify the carrier has the PVCs mapped end-to-end correctly in their network. The ATM physical circuit might be fine and dandy but if they have multiple ATM switches this goes through and they have a mis-match in their PVC mappings then it isn't going to work. HTH, Erick --- Bill Smith wrote: > Eric, > > Thank you for your response. It was a typo on my > part entering the > information in the posting. The map-list in the > router does have the > correct IP address. > I have defined (many times) the additional PVC's on > the "NEW SITE" > router/map list without any success. I apologize, I > should have stated > that in my previous posting. > > I inserted the neighbor statements in the OSPF > process, but no success. > THE SHOw IP OSPF Neighbor statement shows > ATTMPT/DROTHER for site "c" > but eventually shows as being down. Also, I > receive a message on the > "new site" router " sent youngest key0".. > > Thank You for your assistance.. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:58 PM > To: Bill Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ATM Problem [7:55238] > > Hi, > > The New site has 2 ATM PVCs defined, with a ip entry > mapped to site A and C. Site C has a typo under it's > map-list for the new site, going to 192.58.135.68 > instead of 192.68.135.68. New site has no PVCs for > site B yet configured. > > Also, this is multipoint non-broadcast interface so > under OSPF you will neighbor statements. > > HTH, Erick > > --- Bill Smith wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have a problem/question regarding a current ATM > > Circuit. Currently, > > our ATM cloud connects 4 of our sites. We > > submitted an order to add > > another site into the cloud. The telco provided > the > > vpi's but only two > > sites communicate. > > > > > > Site C > > | > > | > > | > > Site A----------- ATM CLOUD ------------Site > B > > | > > | > > | > > NEW Site > > > > Sites a, b, & c communicate correctly. The "NEW > > Site" was added but > > (pvc's to all sites), but will only communicate > with > > Site A. Teloc has > > checked the VPI's and insists they are correct. > > Which brings up another > > strange item--All the VPI's were the same: > > > > New site > > Originating Destination > > 90 90 > > 100 100 > > 80 80 > > > > I have never noticed VPI's being the same on both > > ends,,Does this sound > > correct? > > > > OSPF is the routing protocol. But only "new site" > > and site a exchange > > info. > > > > Site A > > interface ATM5/0/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.66 255.255.255.240 > > ip pim sparse-mode > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 35 40 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 36 50 aal5snap > > atm pvc 5 95 95 aal5snap > > atm pvc 6 80 80 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 1 > > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 5 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 6 broadcast > > > > > > > > NEW Site > > interface ATM3/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.68 255.255.255.240 > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 05180702014D43 > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 95 95 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 broadcast > > ip 192.68.135.65 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > > > > > > > Site C > > interface ATM1/0/0 > > ip address 192.68.135.65 255.255.255.240 > > ip ospf authentication-key 7 010007097B0A0B4F > > ip ospf network non-broadcast > > map-group TEST > > atm pvc 1 40 40 aal5snap > > atm pvc 2 100 100 aal5snap > > atm pvc 3 37 60 aal5snap > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > > > > > map-list TEST > > ip 192.68.135.66 atm-vc 1 > > ip 192.68.135.67 atm-vc 3 > > ip 192.68.135.68 atm-vc 2 broadcast > > > > Any help is greatly appreciated! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ===== > "Those who are willing to trade freedom for security > deserve neither > freedom nor security." -- Benjamin Franklin > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55242&t=55238 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
