Kind of, ip nat pool NATPOOL 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside source list 1 pool NATPOOL
ip access-list 1 permit 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 Where would one go from here to have the NAT pool of 1.10 to 1.20 utilized and also PAT if every address is used from the pool. The nat inside source list defines which addresses can be nated from the pool. Another form of the command is with the overload statement as you mentioned. But if I enter this it will only PAT through the first address in the pool in testing (192.168.1.10. I can't determine if it would use the next address in the pool because of the use of numerous ports. Will it just dynamically choose from the pool as if they are all PAT addresses? If this is the case then it sounds like in the situation I am trying to address I would be best off defining a static NAT mapping from the pool to the outside for the specific hosts that I want, and let the rest PAT. Hopefully this makes sense. -Adam ""MADMAN"" wrote in message news:200210241940.TAA32116@;groupstudy.com... > do you mean: > > C2620B(config)#ip nat inside source list 1 pool MADMAN overload > > Dave > > trammer wrote: > > > > Dave, > > > > Can you post an example. Is the syntax different then what I am thinking. > > > > thnx > > > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > > news:200210241606.QAA03297@;groupstudy.com... > > > Use the overload command though unlike the PIX when you overload, > > > (PAT) on a router it's kinda arbitrary. Some connection will use NAT > > > and others will PAT, it does not wait until the last address in the pool > > > is used before converting to PAT. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > trammer wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Quick question that I am having trouble locating the answer on. > > > > > > > > Basically I need to know whether you can configure PAT to work in > > > > conjunction with a NAT pool on an IOS router. 12.2.x on 2621? > > > > > > > > Ex. Nat pool of 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20 Once all nat pool IPs are > > > > taken. Roll to a PAT on say 192.168.1.21. > > > > > > > > Naturally I would think this is possible, but then again I could be > > wrong. > > > > > > > > I know this is possible on the PIX but cannot find specifics for an IOS > > > > router configuration. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > -- > > > David Madland > > > CCIE# 2016 > > > Sr. Network Engineer > > > Qwest Communications > > > 612-664-3367 > > > > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > > > Churchill > -- > David Madland > CCIE# 2016 > Sr. Network Engineer > Qwest Communications > 612-664-3367 > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56239&t=56208 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]