Add the command overload: ip nat inside source list 1 pool NATPOOL overload but like I mentioned earlier this does not mean IOS will use NAT until the last address is used, it seems rather arbitrary wheras the PIX will use all the NAT address before using PAT.
Dave trammer wrote: > > Kind of, > > ip nat pool NATPOOL 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 > ip nat inside source list 1 pool NATPOOL > > ip access-list 1 permit 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255 > > Where would one go from here to have the NAT pool of 1.10 to 1.20 utilized > and also PAT if every address is used from the pool. > > The nat inside source list defines which addresses can be nated from the > pool. Another form of the command is with the overload statement as you > mentioned. But if I enter this it will only PAT through the first address > in the pool in testing (192.168.1.10. I can't determine if it would use > the next address in the pool because of the use of numerous ports. > > Will it just dynamically choose from the pool as if they are all PAT > addresses? If this is the case then it sounds like in the situation I am > trying to address I would be best off defining a static NAT mapping from the > pool to the outside for the specific hosts that I want, and let the rest > PAT. > > Hopefully this makes sense. > > -Adam > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > news:200210241940.TAA32116@;groupstudy.com... > > do you mean: > > > > C2620B(config)#ip nat inside source list 1 pool MADMAN overload > > > > Dave > > > > trammer wrote: > > > > > > Dave, > > > > > > Can you post an example. Is the syntax different then what I am > thinking. > > > > > > thnx > > > > > > ""MADMAN"" wrote in message > > > news:200210241606.QAA03297@;groupstudy.com... > > > > Use the overload command though unlike the PIX when you overload, > > > > (PAT) on a router it's kinda arbitrary. Some connection will use NAT > > > > and others will PAT, it does not wait until the last address in the > pool > > > > is used before converting to PAT. > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > trammer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > Quick question that I am having trouble locating the answer on. > > > > > > > > > > Basically I need to know whether you can configure PAT to work in > > > > > conjunction with a NAT pool on an IOS router. 12.2.x on 2621? > > > > > > > > > > Ex. Nat pool of 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20 Once all nat pool IPs > are > > > > > taken. Roll to a PAT on say 192.168.1.21. > > > > > > > > > > Naturally I would think this is possible, but then again I could be > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > > > I know this is possible on the PIX but cannot find specifics for an > IOS > > > > > router configuration. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > -- > > > > David Madland > > > > CCIE# 2016 > > > > Sr. Network Engineer > > > > Qwest Communications > > > > 612-664-3367 > > > > > > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > > > > Churchill > > -- > > David Madland > > CCIE# 2016 > > Sr. Network Engineer > > Qwest Communications > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > > Churchill -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56247&t=56208 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
