Hi,

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/556/nat-faq.html#Q13 (including Q14)
describes the functionality when using multiple addresses in an overload. As
MADMAN says, it4s kind of arbitrary.

Some colleagues of mine tried to NAT/PAT in the same way that You want about
a year ago, but unfortunately the did not find a solution. They ended up
with a PIX instead. I don4t think it is possible.

Dan


> MADMAN wrote:
> Add the command overload:
> 
> ip nat inside source list 1 pool NATPOOL overload
>   
> but like I mentioned earlier this does not mean IOS will use NAT until
> the last address is used, it seems rather arbitrary wheras 
> the PIX will
> use all the NAT address before using PAT.
> 
>  Dave
> 
> 
> trammer wrote:
> > 
> > Kind of,
> > 
> > ip nat pool NATPOOL 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.20 netmask 255.255.255.0
> > ip nat inside source list 1 pool NATPOOL
> > 
> > ip access-list 1 permit 10.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
> > 
> > Where would one go from here to have the NAT pool of 1.10 
> to 1.20 utilized
> > and also PAT if every address is used from the pool.
> > 
> > The nat inside source list defines which addresses can be 
> nated from the
> > pool.  Another form of the command is with the overload 
> statement as you
> > mentioned.  But if I enter this it will only PAT through 
> the first address
> > in the pool in testing (192.168.1.10.   I can't determine 
> if it would use
> > the next address in the pool because of the use of numerous ports.
> > 
> > Will it just dynamically choose from the pool as if they are all PAT
> > addresses?   If this is the case then it sounds like in the 
> situation I am
> > trying to address I would be best off defining a static NAT 
> mapping from
> the
> > pool to the outside for the specific hosts that I want, and 
> let the rest
> > PAT.
> > 
> > Hopefully this makes sense.
> > 
> > -Adam
> > 
> > ""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > news:200210241940.TAA32116@;groupstudy.com...
> > > do you mean:
> > >
> > > C2620B(config)#ip nat inside source list 1 pool MADMAN overload
> > >
> > >   Dave
> > >
> > > trammer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dave,
> > > >
> > > > Can you post an example.  Is the syntax different then what I am
> > thinking.
> > > >
> > > > thnx
> > > >
> > > > ""MADMAN""  wrote in message
> > > > news:200210241606.QAA03297@;groupstudy.com...
> > > > > Use the overload command though unlike the PIX when 
> you overload,
> > > > > (PAT) on a router it's kinda arbitrary.  Some 
> connection will use NAT
> > > > > and others will PAT, it does not wait until the last 
> address in the
> > pool
> > > > > is used before converting to PAT.
> > > > >
> > > > >   Dave
> > > > >
> > > > > trammer wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Quick question that I am having trouble locating 
> the answer on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Basically I need to know whether you can configure 
> PAT to work in
> > > > > > conjunction with a NAT pool on an IOS router. 
> 12.2.x on 2621?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ex.  Nat pool of 192.168.1.10-192.168.1.20   Once 
> all nat pool IPs
> > are
> > > > > > taken.  Roll to a PAT on say 192.168.1.21.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Naturally I would think this is possible, but then 
> again I could be
> > > > wrong.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know this is possible on the PIX but cannot find 
> specifics for an
> > IOS
> > > > > > router configuration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > --
> > > > > David Madland
> > > > > CCIE# 2016
> > > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > > Qwest Communications
> > > > > 612-664-3367
> > > > >
> > > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich 
> poorer." --Winston
> > > > > Churchill
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > Qwest Communications
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich 
> poorer." --Winston
> > > Churchill
> -- 
> David Madland
> CCIE# 2016
> Sr. Network Engineer
> Qwest Communications
> 612-664-3367
> 
> "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston
> Churchill




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56354&t=56208
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to