Gaz wrote: > > > > I can't do the following though. Windows 98 gives an error > message and won't > > add the route: > > > > route add 100.100.100.2 mask 255.255.255.240 gateway > > > > I can do this though: > > > > route add 100.100.100.2 mask 255.255.255.254 gateway > > Not sure what you were trying with the first one. Have I > misunderstood? > I don't know any device that would accept a route without using > the > network address. (100.100.100.2 is the network address for a > 255.255.255.254 mask, but not for 255.255.255.224). > > But now you've got me worried, because I know your pedigree > :-). > Humo(u)r me. What d'ya mean.
I just wasn't thinking! I was rushing. Of course, Windows gave me an error for that. Too bad it wasn't an error that meant anything. I think it said error 87 or something. ;-) > > > All this has given me an idea though. > I would like to have used the same IP address on my laptop when > I'm at > home and at work. > I had to change my local subnet at home, because when I VPN in > to work, > I have 192.168.80.0/24 at both ends. I should, if what we're > thinking is > right, be able to put a more specific route on for the odd > addresses I > need to get to at work, primarily remote desktop to my work PC, > our > local router and a couple of terminal servers. > That way I can leave my IP address the same for both locations > (probably). I think that would work. Let us know. Thanks. Priscilla > > Gaz > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56422&t=56347 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
