This is the opposite as to what cisco was telling me. I definately have line of site, they told me (2) 1200's with the outdoor antennas is all I would need. Are you saying I would need the bridges as well? How much bandwith is that offereing? I am only using the wireless for the data for now. i will look into the voice aspect later..
TIA, -Kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mac" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 1:14 AM Subject: Re: Aironet 1200 [7:59310] > You will have to buy 2 wireless bridges. > The 350 series wireless bridges are 802.11b. 100 milliwat, and support > rp-tnc connectors, this will allow you to choose a range of antennas to use. > I would supose you have 3 major issues to worry about > 1. I am assuming you have line of sight currently, are there any trees that > will grow leaves in the spring in your path? > 2. Current voice and data integration - there are 2 likely ways that you may > be intagrated > a. using a channel bank on your csu-dsu e.g. 1 serial port to your pbx, > 1 to your router, and the same thing on the oposite side of the T1 line > b. you are doing a voip integration with Drop and Insert cards > if you are running choice a, then you will have to deal with your voice > integration, if choice b, then you will just to reconfigure your router to > support the new wan > integration > 3. Wireless security- Luckily cisco access points and bridges support > dynamic wep key rotation. If you are implimenting bridges then you will have > to configure > Leap. This makes it necessary to configure Internet Authentication > Server, or Cisco Secure ACS server, or whater radius implimentation of your > choice. > > Hope this helps, > Colin McNamara > > > ""Kevin O'Gilvie"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I am looking to get rid of the fractional T1. > > We have 12 voice 12 data.. > > We can save money going wireless and increse the throughput.. > > I want to go 802.11b all the way.. > > Isnt the bridge 11a. > > If I have antennas on both sides wont that be enough? > > Please let me know your thoughts.. > > there will be about 20 users in the remote office.. > > > > TIA, > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > >From: "Charlie Wehner" > > >Reply-To: "Charlie Wehner" > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: RE: Aironet 1200 [7:59310] > > >Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 02:07:40 GMT > > > > > >What type of throughput does the remote office need? With two 1200 > series > > >access points you can: > > > > > >a) Run one AP as Root and the other in Repeater mode. > > >b) Blast the signal across the street with just one AP > > > > > >I don't think you can bridge with 1200s series APs. You might be better > > >off > > >buying 350 bridges instead depending on your environment. > > > > > >You could also buy a WGB to connect to one of the APs. That's another > > >option. > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59368&t=59310 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
