Exactly..
We have an external CSU/DSU for the PBX..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mac" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Aironet 1200 [7:59310]


> 11 megabit, for 802.11b, so with headers and encryption, 8-9 megabit.
> Weather conditions, distance, and interferance can nock this rate down.
> the 2 db dipole "rubber ducky" antenna's that come stock with AP's and
some
> Bridges have about a 200 meter range.  If you have any questions on what
> antennas, cables and towers may be appropriate for you just go to
cisco.com
> tac tools, and aironet antenna calculator. This will tell you how much
> distance/throughput/antenna hieght you will need/get.
>
> Question on your voice integration, does the PBX connect directly into an
> external csu/dsu that the router does (such as a kentrox with 2 v.35
> connections) or does it plug into your router into a vwic card ?.
>
> Cheers,
> Colin McNamara
>
> ""Kevin O'Gilvie""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > You are right.
> > The 1200's dont support briging as yet, they are just WAP's.
> > How much bandwidth does the 350 offer?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Charlie Wehner"
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:07 PM
> > Subject: RE: Aironet 1200 [7:59310]
> >
> >
> > > What type of throughput does the remote office need?  With two 1200
> series
> > > access points you can:
> > >
> > > a) Run one AP as Root and the other in Repeater mode.
> > > b) Blast the signal across the street with just one AP
> > >
> > > I don't think you can bridge with 1200s series APs.  You might be
better
> > off
> > > buying 350 bridges instead depending on your environment.
> > >
> > > You could also buy a WGB to connect to one of the APs.  That's another
> > > option.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59383&t=59310
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to