I'm sorry to say, but even after accessing it 10 times from any machine it
is just as slow as the first time.

-----Original Message-----
From: steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]


hi,

this is a java "FEATURE" ,...we run it on a sun E250 dual proc 1gb mem and
it goes very well..

once you have accepted the first security "token" and select "grant always"
the problem will go away ,,,

it is authenticating "of sorts" your PC .....hell ...actually it is just
registering it for future updates..

also you must remember on a pc that has never connected  to CW2K the server
download`s and install the java 1.3_01 client ,which can take some time..3-7
mins with install

but again this only happen`s once...
when you register your Pc buy saying "GRANT ALWAYS" some java CAR files are
installed onto your machine which simply register you everytime you
logon....also  the web server itself, keeps some cookie info about which
machine`s have tried to log on unsuccessfully..

it`s ok and part of the process ... just say YES

I have used Cw2k for some time and have got USED TOO it`s little forboyles

HTH

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Jimenez" 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 10:38 PM
Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]


> Is it from just one particular workstation or any workstation?  IE and 
> Netscape both?
>
> I've had intermittent problems accessing CW2K servers from my laptop - 
> usually because I've done something funky with my Java settings or 
> installed one to many new widgets.  I've had to reinstall IE/Netscape 
> before I could get it to work right.
>
> Wouldn't hurt to make sure that the server is patched to current revs 
> as well.
>
> Frank Jimenez, CCIE #738
> Systems Engineer
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf 
> Of Arnold, Jamie
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 6:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]
>
>
> What about *very* slow access to CiscoWorks?  We're running it from a 
> new Dell 2550, 2 processors, 1gb or ram and the box does nothing but 
> run CW. Accessing it from a workstation takes literally minutes to 
> load the initial page and then another 3-4 minutes to load the device 
> manager. Is this common?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> "Imagination is more important than knowledge"
>
> Albert Einstein
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amr Essam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]
>
>
> Piyush
>
> Check the permissions for the user you logged on with to the 
> ciscoworks And check the java settings in the web browser too I have 
> passed with this kind of problem but it was solved by this way as it's 
> mainly related with the browser
>
> Amr
>
>    -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf 
> Of Mr piyush shah
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 11:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]
>
> Hi all
> I have windows2000 suite of NMS.I have installed CD1
> with version 4 .Now that I can acess the same locally
> ,while When I am trying to acess ciscoview through web
> using port 1741 on other pC,I am getting the error
> Please grant the permission to acess Ciscoview.I
> wonder whether where should I grant the
> permisiion.Request all to help me.
> Piyush
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> __
> Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV.
>        visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60599&t=60285
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to