if you have a CCO customer account, there are a lot of articles in the TAC
database

this one is a good start, I believe.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note0
9186a0080093fca.shtml
watch the wrap.

HTH

--
TANSTAAFL
"there ain't no such thing as a free lunch"




""Emilia Lambros""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all,
>
> I have an application being load balanced at one site (sticky sessions set
> such that each connection from 1 IP will continue its transactions to the
> same server it started on) and at another site, the users accessing the
load
> balanced application.
>
> The users come in from different office locations across private WAN
links,
> nat inside is on each of their interfaces and on each interface out of the
> router those WAN links connect to, is nat outside.
>
> I have changed their initial configuration based on NAT overload to an
> interface IP address to be a pool of addresses overloaded.  I was hoping
> that the connections would spill over to the second IP in the pool at some
> stage sooner than the 8500 NAT connections I have currently, but no go.  I
> may as well have NAT'd to 1 IP again :)
>
> Is there a way to overload NAT, but have it using more than 1 IP in the
> pool?  e.g. a pool of 30 IPs, its currently using 1.. I'd love the router
to
> even round robin the use of IPs out of the pool but I can't play with the
> config to try it (live environment) and can't find any documentation
online
> explaining exactly what I need NAT to do/not do :(
>
> Thanks,
>
> Em :)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60664&t=60663
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to