oops - forgot where I was going here is a jump page
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:NA T requires CCO customer login. and this one for more detail in design and operation http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:NA T&s=Implementation_and_Configuration watch the wrap on this one - who knows how the groupstudy server will mangle this one. -- TANSTAAFL "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" ""Emilia Lambros"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi all, > > I have an application being load balanced at one site (sticky sessions set > such that each connection from 1 IP will continue its transactions to the > same server it started on) and at another site, the users accessing the load > balanced application. > > The users come in from different office locations across private WAN links, > nat inside is on each of their interfaces and on each interface out of the > router those WAN links connect to, is nat outside. > > I have changed their initial configuration based on NAT overload to an > interface IP address to be a pool of addresses overloaded. I was hoping > that the connections would spill over to the second IP in the pool at some > stage sooner than the 8500 NAT connections I have currently, but no go. I > may as well have NAT'd to 1 IP again :) > > Is there a way to overload NAT, but have it using more than 1 IP in the > pool? e.g. a pool of 30 IPs, its currently using 1.. I'd love the router to > even round robin the use of IPs out of the pool but I can't play with the > config to try it (live environment) and can't find any documentation online > explaining exactly what I need NAT to do/not do :( > > Thanks, > > Em :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60665&t=60663 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
