Hi Priscilla, I am reading your book that you sent me..why?
:) need more info ? Larry Letterman Network Engineer Cisco Systems ----- Original Message ----- From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: RE: Catalyst 4000 and DHCP [7:62632] > Waters, Kristina wrote: > > > > I am curious as to whether anything else got upgraded besides > > the new > > switch. I got the impression that this wasn't a problem before > > the upgrade, > > in which case portfast could definitely be the culprit. > > However, you could > > also see this error if DNS is improperly configured in a win2k > > domain. Also, > > I'm not sure about this, but if the 4006 has a sup3 or sup4, > > could the > > problem be related to layer 3? > > Sure it could. He says all that he did was put a switch in, but there's a > good chance he did more than that, but we may never know... Sigh. But a new > switch might imply that he also put in VLANs, a L3 module, etc. > > When people send in questions, it would be nice if they would send in enough > info so we could do more than guess. It would be nice if they would provide > a follow-up also and let us know what the problem really was and what fixed > it. > > Some people can't stand the "out of the office" messages. > > I can't stand the messages that ressemble someone calling their doctor on > the phone and saying no more than, "Hey doc, I'm tired. Why?" > > Now, if you go to the doctor in person, this might be OK because then the > doctor can examine you. Here the analogy falls apart. We can't examine > someone else's network. However, the wise poster will communicate info to us > about their examination of their network to help us help them. (This isn't > targetted at the original poster specifically, who did supply at least some > info.) > > Troubleshooting should be done systematically. It's not a guessing game. > > Hope we learn more about what the issue was! It could be educational for > many of us. > > Priscilla > > > > > Kris > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:24 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Catalyst 4000 and DHCP [7:62632] > > > > > > Tunde Kalejaiye wrote: > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > we just upgraded our network to a switched, a catalyst 4006 > > to be > > > exact....some users have been getting 'no domain server > > > available ....' > > > error message. they usually have to try more than 4 - 6 times > > to > > > successfully log on to the network. > > > has anybody come across this problem before? what work around > > > did u use > > > besides configuring static ip addresses? > > > thanks for your response(s) in advance > > > > Your message title implies that there's a problem with DHCP, > > but then your > > message text implies that the problem is with Windows > > networking, > > specifically a client trying to reach the domain controller? (I > > assume you > > mean the Windows type domain server and not the IP Domain Name > > System.) > > > > So, verify for yourself and us that DHCP is working first. If > > the failure is > > with DHCP, try the stuff other folks recommended. Enable > > portfast so that > > the clients can start receiving replies to their DHCP request > > ASAP. Also, > > you may need a helper address, depending on where your DHCP > > server is > > located. Feel free to send us more info about your topology and > > configuration. > > > > Then, you have to get Winblows working. I did have all sorts of > > problems > > getting this to work with a consulting client who had upgraded > > to VLANs. > > Unfortunately, he fixed the problems in the end without my > > help, so I don't > > know the details, one of the frustrating things about being a > > consulant. (A > > lot of help that is. ;-) But you could look through some Group > > Study > > messages from about a month ago. A bunch of folks had ideas to > > help. I think > > the title of the thread was something about Windows Networking. > > > > Here's one message that a wise person on the list sent' I've > > forgotten who, > > sorry. > > > > "Simplest solution is to put a WINS Server on the Subnet that > > can't find the > > DC. Configure it to replicate with the DC on the other Subnet, > > or Statically > > configure the Domain Name entry for the NT Domain on the WINS > > Server in the > > troubled subnet. Your "DC Not Found" issue should be resolved > > then. > > > > More Administratively intensive solution is to modify the > > LMHOSTS file to > > have the following entry on every Windows Workstation/Server in > > the troubled > > subnet. > > > > IP.ADD.RE.SS MachineName #PRE #DOM:Domain-Name" > > > > > > Microsoft has tons of documentation on this sort of thing. > > > > Keep us posted! Thanks, > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > Tunde > > ************************************************************ ********** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential > > and > > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom > > they > > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please > > notify > > the sender by email, delete and destroy this message and its > > attachments. > > ************************************************************ ********** [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62688&t=62632 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
