>I have a class B network subnetted using a 21 bit mask.  This network
has 2
>connections to the internet, 1 is by a T3 the other is a 512K T1. 
Each
>connection to the internet comes out of a subnet, goes through a
firewall,
>and then through a Cisco 7200 router.  We have static routes in place
to
>assure that the returning packets go to the proper firewall.  I don't
know
>for sure if the routers connecting to the internet are running BGP or
some
>thing else.  We have seen packets go out one interface and return on
the
>other.  I suspect that something is not right with the border routers.
 Any
>thoughts or suggestions?

They're probably using BGP and they're both advertising the same
prefixes.  This is actually pretty normal behavior.  You don't have a
large degree of control of return traffic back to your network.  There
are  a number of things that you can try to influence the path other
providers use but they key word there is "influence".   It's very
difficult--if not impossible--to enforce your routing policies on other
providers.  If one of them chooses one path over another to get back to
your network, the best you can do is attempt to determine why that
traffic is behaving that way and try to come up with a way to alleviate
the problem.  That's assuming it's really a problem.

In your case, it could be a problem because your links are so
imbalanced.  I'd be tempted to leave the 512K T1 shutdown until it was
needed.  If you get too much traffic coming back down that link you'll
create pinhole congestion.  The rest of the world doesn't know that you
have a T3 and a 512K fractional T1.  They just see two paths back to
your network.

If your links were on the same router I think you could configure a
conditional advertisement with BGP.  This allow you not to advertise
your network from the 512K T1 unless you stopped seeing BGP routes from
the provider on the T3.

There are other things that can be tried, such as AS path prepends,
tweaking the MED, etc., but there is no rule that any other provider has
to pay any attention to that information whatsoever so your results may
vary.

HTH,
John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62901&t=62863
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to