must ... find... coffee  ....

just catching back up as dc awakens.  the default gateways used by the 
pc's are the virtual router addresses, a different one for each (i.e. 
pc1 uses virtual router 1 and pc2 uses virtual router 2).  the pc arp 
caches correctly reflect the virtual mac address (cisco generated 
00000c...)which are different than the router interfaces bia's.  the 
virtual macs do move and the different interfaces do seem to stop and 
start their role as the active interface.

looking over the traces last nite didn't yield much more.  i have a 
couple things to try and i did find a tac article that holds some hope 
using standby use-bia.  we'll see.

thanks for all your thoughts and help.  i'll get this to work or i'll 
revert to plan b, 2 tin cans and ...

----- Original Message -----
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer 
Date: Thursday, March 6, 2003 5:14 pm
Subject: RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

> What did you use a default gateway on the PCs??
> 
> Priscilla
> 
> garrett allen wrote:
> > 
> > i have a need for a high availability solution for a default
> > gateway
> > configuration.  just finished the ccdp and thought it might be 
> > interesting to try hsrp on a pair of 2514's.  put some of that
> > theory
> > to work.  instead of highly resiliant i've managed to configure
> > it for
> > mass failure.  arg.., not exactly what i had in mind.  now, any
> > time i
> > take down 1 of the 4 links, the connect between 2 remote hosts
> > dies.
> > this is in a lab (production is not a lab, production is not a
> > lab...)
> > so it is a mystery i would like to solve, but it is not
> > critical.
> > 
> > here is the basic config (hope it makes it):
> > 
> > pc host 1  -----+----- e0 router 1, e1 ----+---------  pc host 2
> >                 |                          |
> >                 |----- e0 router 2, e1 ----|
> > 
> > the routers act as a default gateway between the internal
> > network
> > (represented by pc host 1) and the external world (represented
> > by pc
> > host 2).  i have used 10.3 and 10.4 /16 as the addresses for
> > each side
> > of the divide.  i want to run hsrp on both sets of router
> > interfaces so
> > that in the event a router or an interface fails, the traffic
> > impact is
> > minimized.  in the real world pc host 2 will be a firewall and
> > there
> > will be other hosts off that segment as well
> > 
> > looks easy.  sounds plausible.  read the cisco docs.  looks
> > like it
> > should work.  minimal incantations before tickling the
> > keyboard.  key
> > in the configs and it fires up nicely. do the show standby
> > thingee and
> > all looks cool.  can ping the 2 stations end to end.  most
> > excellent.
> > put a router in debug mode.  when i pull one of the 4 router
> > cables the
> > router goes through a state change but no bits make it to the
> > far end.
> > not even the shiney ones.  bitstream courtesy of ping.
> > 
> > maybe i misunderstood what hsrp was suppose to do.  the configs
> > are
> > below, along with the show standby results.  both are 2514's (2
> > aui's)
> > and both are running 12.2(1d).  probably forgot to put the
> > interface in
> > mumble mode or something equally easy.  no laughter, please.
> > 
> > thanks in advance.
> > 
> > router 1
> > interface Ethernet0
> >  ip address 10.3.255.2 255.255.0.0
> >  no ip route-cache
> >  no ip mroute-cache
> >  standby 1 priority 200 preempt
> >  standby 1 ip 10.3.0.2
> > !
> > interface Ethernet1
> >  ip address 10.4.254.2 255.255.0.0
> >  no ip route-cache
> >  no ip mroute-cache
> >  standby 2 priority 200 preempt
> >  standby 2 ip 10.4.254.10
> > 
> > 
> > router 2
> > interface Ethernet0
> >  ip address 10.3.255.1 255.255.0.0
> >  no ip route-cache
> >  no ip mroute-cache
> >  standby 1 priority 225 preempt
> >  standby 1 ip 10.3.0.2
> > !
> > interface Ethernet1
> >  ip address 10.4.254.1 255.255.0.0
> >  no ip route-cache
> >  no ip mroute-cache
> >  standby 2 priority 150 preempt
> >  standby 2 ip 10.4.254.10
> > 
> > results of show standby
> > Router1#show standby
> > Ethernet0 - Group 1
> >   Local state is Standby, priority 200, may preempt
> >   Hellotime 3 holdtime 10
> >   Next hello sent in 00:00:00.940
> >   Hot standby IP address is 10.3.0.2 configured
> >   Active router is 10.3.255.1 expires in 00:00:09, priority 225
> >   Standby router is local
> >   20 state changes, last state change 00:22:34
> > Ethernet1 - Group 2
> >   Local state is Active, priority 200, may preempt
> >   Hellotime 3 holdtime 10
> >   Next hello sent in 00:00:01.676
> >   Hot standby IP address is 10.4.254.10 configured
> >   Active router is local
> >   Standby router is 10.4.254.1 expires in 00:00:08
> >   Standby virtual mac address is 0000.0c07.ac02
> >   17 state changes, last state change 00:23:26
> > Router1#
> > 
> > Router2#show standby
> > Ethernet0 - Group 1
> >   Local state is Active, priority 225, may preempt
> >   Hellotime 3 holdtime 10
> >   Next hello sent in 00:00:01.010
> >   Hot standby IP address is 10.3.0.2 configured
> >   Active router is local
> >   Standby router is 10.3.255.2 expires in 00:00:09
> >   Standby virtual mac address is 0000.0c07.ac01
> >   24 state changes, last state change 00:22:04
> > Ethernet1 - Group 2
> >   Local state is Standby, priority 150, may preempt
> >   Hellotime 3 holdtime 10
> >   Next hello sent in 00:00:01.272
> >   Hot standby IP address is 10.4.254.10 configured
> >   Active router is 10.4.254.2 expires in 00:00:09, priority 200
> >   Standby router is local
> >   32 state changes, last state change 00:22:25
> > Router2#
> Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64706&t=64638
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to