On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote: > are you on the clamav-virusdb mailing list?
Yes, but it doesn't say whether the viruses are old or new, and looking them up given the various names used and the quantity of updates is not very convenient. > Tomasz Kojm sent out an update on Saturday with about 200 old viruses > (main 15) Denis De Messemacker sent out an update of about 50 newer viri > (daily 84) Diego d'Ambra sent out an update of 5 hot viruses > (Dropper.Xombe.A, Trojan.Xombe.A, HTML_CITIFRAUD.A, and another damaged > Swen) (daily 83). Thanks, that puts things into a little perspective. I'm really just looking for a GENERAL idea. For example, if you had to explain to the average user what sort of viruses were being added to the database...is it MOSTLY new ones? MOSTLY old ones? About half and half? Would it be fair to say that when a new update comes out that it has likely been triggered by a recent discovery? Jeffrey Moskot System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
