On 2/28/2011 10:03 AM, Royce Williams wrote: > For future-proofing purposes, would it be feasible to enable > optionally tagging a signature with its minimum supported ClamAV > version? > > In other words, the entry is tagged with "min 0.98.2", and if you're > running 0.98.1, it ignores it, but complains loudly so that people > know that they're running less-than-complete signature set. This > would allow folks to plan and execute a scheduled upgrade, instead of > a panicked one.
ClamAV 0.96 was released in April of 2010. How much time do you need to schedule an upgrade? If my servers were still running an old version a month after an update, I would consider it a serious problem. AV programs need to be kept up to date in order to provide the best protection. -- Bowie _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml