On August 7, 2015 9:17:44 PM EDT, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@wdtv.com> wrote: >On Friday 07 August 2015 18:34:30 Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On August 7, 2015 6:30:42 PM EDT, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@wdtv.com> >wrote: >> >On Friday 07 August 2015 16:58:09 Al Varnell wrote: >> >> Gene, >> >> >> >> It’s on the sanesecurity.net mirror sites, not the ones clamav.net >> >> provides, so freshclam isn’t going to find those. >> >> >> >> As Steve said earlier, you would have to install, configure and >use >> >> the download script from >> >> >> >> <https://github.com/extremeshok/clamav-unofficial-sigs> >> > >> >Which claims to nee clamav, V99, and wheezy is still on 98.5. >> > >> >And yelling at debian is a waste of time. So I'll go comment that >> > line >> >> Dude, >> >> Chill. >> >> 0.99 isn't released yet, so of course it's not in wheezy. It is in >> Experimental where it belongs. No yelling needed. >> >> Scott K > >That depends on ones point of view. Has anyone started a timer running > >to see how long it takes for the latest fix for the firefox/iceweasel >exploit announced yesterday to actually get into the wheezy repo's? I >don't recommend anything less than a wind it once a year clock. > >The security ralated stuff should be moved out asap by the distro's & I > >don't care whose logo is on your boot screen. Not when someone is >bored >out of their skull for lack of anything more interesting to do.
No idea. I don't maintain those packages. If you look though, you'll see that over the last several years, Debian generally has a good response on clamav. That's what I was objecting to. I do take claims I'm not doing it well personally. Scott K _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
