???? I already gave you an answer about going with a commercial product, even 
gave you a recommendation. Are you stuck on ClamAV and insisting on somehow 
integrating it in an enterprise setting which was not designed to do by itself 
or do you just randomly post things to take up people's time or do you not 
understand?



-----Original Message-----
From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of 
crazy thinker
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 8:20 AM
To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV for EnterPrise

@Joel

That Sounds good  but ClamAV is OpenSource.. how can we use it in Commercial 
Product ?

On 19 April 2017 at 17:07, Joel Esler (jesler) <jes...@cisco.com> wrote:

> All --
>
> ClamAV does not have any plans on making an enterprise version or 
> management console. We make a commercial product for that, which also 
> uses ClamAV in its engine.
>
> I think that settles the conversation.
>
> --
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 19, 2017, at 04:08, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Am 19.04.2017 um 07:16 schrieb crazy thinker:
> >> @G.W Haywood..
> >> it would be sounds good if you speak  in polite way.. evey one can 
> >> bark
> on
> >> others.. but that is not solution here. i hope you understand well
> >
> > that was polite after following your posts for some days now
> >
> >>> On 19 April 2017 at 02:00, G.W. Haywood 
> >>> <cla...@jubileegroup.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, crazy thinker wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  - I am looking for  below features in Enterprise Environment
> >>>>  -
> >>>>  - *Antivirus/Antispyware*
> >>>>  - *Desktop Firewall*
> >>>>  - *Intrusion Prevention*
> >>>>  - *Browser Protection*
> >>>>  - *Antivirus for Mac & Linux*
> >>>>  - *Device & Application Control*
> >>>>  - *Virtualization Features*
> >>>>  - *Centralized and Granular Policy Management*
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> The more questions you ask on this and the development list, the 
> >>> more painfully obvious it becomes to me that you have no idea what 
> >>> you are talking about.  The list which you have provided above is 
> >>> garbage; if you took that to a commercial supplier they would 
> >>> probably fall about laughing after they have sold you a lot of 
> >>> useless junk and shown you out of the door.
> >>>
> >>> The best thing you can do is get yourself some good training, so 
> >>> that you will become capable of making rational decisions based on 
> >>> sound (and not crazy) thinking.  You should expect the training, 
> >>> if pursued full-time, to take at least a couple of years to get 
> >>> you to the point where you at least know what a firewall does.  To 
> >>> know how properly to configure one would, if you were no more than 
> >>> an average pupil in the first course, probably take a couple more 
> >>> years.  If this sounds a bit like a batchelor's degree in computer 
> >>> science, that's not far wrong.
> >>>
> >>> The next best thing would be to employ someone competent, but with 
> >>> your current level of understanding I have no idea how you are 
> >>> going to be able to judge the competence of a prospective employee.
> >>>
> >>> To give you a rough idea of what level of skill you should be 
> >>> looking for, I would not allow someone with a new computer science 
> >>> degree to make unsupervised configuration changes to computer 
> >>> defences until he or she had worked for me for at least a few 
> >>> months - probably more like a couple of years - so that I could assess 
> >>> his/her capabilities.
> >>> I managed to get a first class honours degree in engineering in 
> >>> 1976, I've been working with computers for over forty years, and 
> >>> I'm STILL learning new, interesting and sneaky tricks which could 
> >>> easily eat my lunch if I weren't careful.  It's a jungle out there, it 
> >>> really is.
> >>>
> >>> If you plan to risk the livelihoods of employees on your own 
> >>> present computer skills, then I'd have to say I think that is 
> >>> irresponsible, and with the present threat levels simply begging for 
> >>> trouble.
> > _______________________________________________
> > clamav-users mailing list
> > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
> >
> >
> > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
> >
> > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
> _______________________________________________
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>
>
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to