Ok, let's start from the beginning. Have you come here with a specific problem that requires a solution
or do you just want to talk about it? 17.03.2018 07:21, Yuri пишет: > To make any useful advice, we're have to know something info about: > > - Task you want to solve > > - Your expectations > > - Your requirements > > - Your possibilities > > Without this abstract questions about abstract overhead (and you must > understand it as Performance Engeneer you said) from you seems wasting > our time. > > Do your understand me? > > As a performance engeneer, with 20 years of experience, I can advice you > to form your questions as shown above, to get any useful answer. > > > 17.03.2018 07:17, Len Sanschargrin пишет: >> I'm not sure why you are trying to characterize performance overhead as >> "issues". Every process running on a server has some resource requirements. >> I am. Performance engineer and my focus is in getting the most out of every >> infrastructure server. Hence my question about overhead. In this case we are >> planning to implement on RHEL and Solaris servers. If you don't have any >> useful info, then please don't waste my time. >> Thanks very much, Len >> >> ---- Yuri <yvoi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If I complain about overhead/performance issue, I should: >>> >>> -Specify hardware/infrastructure details >>> >>> -Usage of system (some specific) >>> >>> - Root case (For example "I test 4 Gb-size ISO images and I has CPU >>> overhead") >>> >>> WIthout this it is only blah-blah-blah. >>> >>> For example: In my case, I have 2 socket (4 cores each) Xeon 2.4 GHz CPU >>> + 16 Gb RAM hardware, using ClamAV under Solaris 10 for real-time web >>> traffic scanning. And in my configuration I have no overhead/performance >>> issues. >>> >>> >>> 17.03.2018 04:59, Yuri пишет: >>>> So, what? >>>> >>>> Real-life experience is useless without full >>>> infrastructure/configuration comparison. >>>> >>>> So, you not focused on real performance issues in this context, just >>>> bla-bla-bla. What overhead? On what tasks? On what infrastructure/hardware? >>>> >>>> What else I miss? >>>> >>>> >>>> 17.03.2018 02:48, Len Sanschargrin пишет: >>>>> The need is not about issues, or comparisons, it's about real-life >>>>> experiences with the product and the overhead observed. Of course we'll >>>>> do our own testing but the earlier we know, the better. We also know some >>>>> features will cost more in terms of overhead than others, so I'm looking >>>>> for real experiences around which features are more expensive, etc.. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks very much, Len >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On >>>>> Behalf Of Yuri >>>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 4:38 PM >>>>> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >>>>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & Solaris >>>>> >>>>> What are you looking for? Performance complains? There is not. >>>>> >>>>> https://i.imgur.com/3Likl14.png >>>>> >>>>> ClamAV runs on this server and it's ok. >>>>> >>>>> Built from sources. >>>>> >>>>> 17.03.2018 02:34, Len Sanschargrin пишет: >>>>>> Any relative numbers you can share? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks very much, Len Sanschargrin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On >>>>>> Behalf Of SCOTT PACKARD >>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 3:47 PM >>>>>> To: ClamAV users ML >>>>>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on RHEL & >>>>>> Solaris >>>>>> >>>>>> It plays on RHEL and Solaris a lot better than Symantec. >>>>>> You should get your Solaris builds from www.unixpackages.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, Scott >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On >>>>>>> Behalf Of Len Sanschargrin >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 10:45 AM >>>>>>> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >>>>>>> Subject: [External] [clamav-users] ClamAV performance overhead on >>>>>>> RHEL & Solaris >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, I have customer who is preparing to implement ClamAV on RHEL >>>>>>> and Solaris. As the Performance engineer, I'm looking for any testing >>>>>>> or stats on potential overhead can be associated with running ClamAV. >>>>>>> Even just anecdotal observations can help us to set expectations and >>>>>>> of course any additional guidance is appreciated! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks very much, Len >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> clamav-users mailing list >>>>>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >>>>>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: >>>>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> clamav-users mailing list >>>>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >>>>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: >>>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> clamav-users mailing list >>>>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >>>>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: >>>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml >>>>> -- >>>>> "C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs." >>>>> >>>>> ***************************** >>>>> * C++20 : Bug to the future * >>>>> ***************************** >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> clamav-users mailing list >>>>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >>>>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: >>>>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq >>>>> >>>>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml >>> -- >>> "C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs." >>> >>> ***************************** >>> * C++20 : Bug to the future * >>> ***************************** >>> >>> -- "C++ seems like a language suitable for firing other people's legs." ***************************** * C++20 : Bug to the future * *****************************
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
