> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Brian Jones > > Paul Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > <snip> > > Non-public classes should be entirely ignored. > > I'll change it to not look at protected in a moment. > No, protected classes *should* be in there. If there is a protected inner class, it will be accessible to subclasses of the enclosing class. I don't know if there are any of these, though. --John Keiser
- more fun with javap Brian Jones
- Re: more fun with javap Paul Fisher
- Re: more fun with javap Brian Jones
- Re: more fun with javap Moses DeJong
- Re: more fun with javap Brian Jones
- Re: more fun with javap John Keiser
- Re: more fun with javap Paul Fisher
- Re: more fun with javap Chris Toshok
- Re: more fun with javap Paul Fisher
- Re: more fun with javap Chris Toshok
- RE: more fun with javap John Keiser
- Re: more fun with javap Aaron M. Renn
- Re: more fun with javap Brian Jones
- Re: more fun with javap Maxim Kizub

