Re: more fun with javap

[Maxim Kizub]

>
>
>"John Keiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> No, protected classes *should* be in there.
>
>Non-public classes should not be shown.  The JLS and corresponding
>documentation comments (javadoc) specs only cover public classes.
>
>We have no need to see the APIs of Sun's internal classes.


Without protected classes/fields/methods the inheritance will be
complietly broken. Protected *must* be there.