Tom Tromey writes: > >>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Stuart> Perhaps in the same spirit as the "throws NotImplementedException" > Stuart> hack, we could add a "NotReallySerializable" interface that classes > Stuart> whose svuids should be ignored could implement... > > I don't think we could do that, as a new 'implements' is user-visible. > An annotation would be ok, I suppose.
Could we not, instead, automatically fix the SerialVersionUID mismatches? After all, if we can automatically determine that they're different, we can automatically fix them, can't we? Andrew.
