Hi folks,
I am still looking for a solution to set up a call between two SIPp
instances (first as a caller and second as a callee). Let me know please if
anyone has successfully done this. Thanks.

Kind Regards,
Junaid

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:37 PM Junaid Ali <junaidaliya...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> The link you shared suggests having two different scenario files for
> registration and call setup. So, I created these files on the callee machine
> register.xml: http://ix.io/1vOj
> call-set-up.xml: http://ix.io/1vOk
>
> While initiating the registration scenario with a small pause or without
> any pause at the end of register.xml, SIPp command on caller machine fails
> with 430 Flow error. I think that error is due to the termination of the
> SIPp process which is responsible for registration on the callee machine
> before the INVITE signal from the caller.
>
> If I add a large pause to keep the registration process alive for a bit
> longer on the callee node, I face this error again:
> <http://goog_643911926>http://ix.io/1vNj . One thing I have observed is
> that INVITE signal is captured by the registration SIPp process instead of
> the call setup SIPp process on the callee machine. Check the image here
> please: https://i.imgur.com/jlFv7mD.jpg , where the upper window is for
> registration and in the lower window I'm running the call set up scenario.
>
>  I'm not passing the '-aa' parameter to the SIPp tool which is suggested
> in the link because then we face the issue you mentioned in your reply#2.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Junaid
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:29 PM Junaid Ali <junaidaliya...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I read this issue earlier and separated the registration and call set up
>> in two different scenario files on the callee machine, but I was getting
>> the same error. Let me separate the registration and call set up on caller
>> machine as well please and see if there is any effect. Thanks a lot for
>> looking into this issue.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Junaid
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:24 PM Mark Perryman <
>> mark.perry...@metaswitch.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Junaid,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You are encountering this problem.
>>> https://github.com/SIPp/sipp/issues/199
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There seem to be suggestions of what to try.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark Perryman.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Clearwater <clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org> *On
>>> Behalf Of *Junaid Ali
>>> *Sent:* 11 December 2018 12:18
>>> *To:* clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Project Clearwater] Initiating calls between two SIPp
>>> instances
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> Just found the cause of that 200 OK response. Actually, I was using
>>> "-aa" as an argument to SIPp tool on the callee machine. The man page of
>>> SIPp for '-aa' argument says: "Enable automatic 200 OK answer for INFO,
>>> UPDATE and NOTIFY messages."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have removed the '-aa' parameter, but now I'm getting this error on
>>> the callee machine: http://ix.io/1vNj. I googled a little bit about
>>> this error and it seems to me that this might be due to different call-ids
>>> on caller and callee responses. SIPp output for callee:
>>> http://ix.io/1vNl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On caller node, I'm getting 408 Timeout error for INVITE sig:
>>> http://ix.io/1vNn
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sprout logs: http://ix.io/1vNg
>>>
>>> Bono logs: http://ix.io/1vNh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Junaid
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:25 AM Junaid Ali <junaidaliya...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Let me check and get back to you in a few minutes please.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:23 AM Mark Perryman <
>>> mark.perry...@metaswitch.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> So bono’s log
>>>
>>> 11-12-2018 10:27:40.054 UTC Verbose common_sip_processing.cpp:136: TX 2739 
>>> bytes Request msg INVITE/cseq=4 (tdta0x7fc5f0052330) to TCP 
>>> 192.168.120.12:60900:
>>>
>>> suggests that the INVITE is sent to the callee.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Something is then responding 200 OK
>>>
>>> 11-12-2018 10:27:40.055 UTC Verbose common_sip_processing.cpp:120: RX 689 
>>> bytes Response msg 200/INVITE/cseq=4 (rdata0x7fc5f80046f0) from TCP 
>>> 192.168.120.12:60900:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is something else running on the callee machine that might be responding
>>> instead of the SIPp script.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Clearwater <clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org> *On
>>> Behalf Of *Junaid Ali
>>> *Sent:* 11 December 2018 10:50
>>> *To:* clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Project Clearwater] Initiating calls between two SIPp
>>> instances
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Apologies for the late reply. I have tried the above scenario files as
>>> well but couldn't make the call work.
>>>
>>> I'm registering a number on the caller and callee machines for
>>> initiating the calls using this csv file: http://ix.io/1vMI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is the scenario file on caller machine: http://ix.io/1vME
>>>
>>> which first registers a number (2010000000) and then send an invite to
>>> callee machine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On callee machine, I'm registering a number (2010000002) and waiting for
>>> the call to establish using this scenario file: http://ix.io/1vMF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The SIPp output on the callee machine looks like this: http://ix.io/1vMK 
>>> which
>>> shows that it gets timeout waiting for INVITE from the caller.
>>>
>>> The output of /var/log/clearwater-sipp/sip-stress_6766_errors.log on
>>> callee is: http://ix.io/1vMO
>>>
>>> which suggests that INVITE is received on the callee machine but it
>>> doesn't get reflected in the SIPp output.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The SIPp output the caller machine is: http://ix.io/1vML
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bono output at log_level=5: http://ix.io/1vMN
>>>
>>> Sprout output at log_level=5: http://ix.io/1vMM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if I'm missing anything in my scenario file since I don't
>>> observe any error messages in bono and sprout logs. Your help is much
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Junaid
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 4:10 PM Mark Perryman <
>>> mark.perry...@metaswitch.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The basic client and server scripts that ship with SIPp itself should be
>>> suitable.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://sipp.sourceforge.net/
>>>
>>> http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html#UAC
>>>
>>> http://sipp.sourceforge.net/doc/reference.html#UAS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hope that helps, let me know if that doesn’t work.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark Perryman.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Clearwater <clearwater-boun...@lists.projectclearwater.org> *On
>>> Behalf Of *Junaid Ali
>>> *Sent:* 04 December 2018 14:10
>>> *To:* clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
>>> *Subject:* [Project Clearwater] Initiating calls between two SIPp
>>> instances
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I am trying to create a call between two SIPp instances (caller and
>>> callee) using Clearwater IMS. Can anyone share the scenario files for
>>> caller and callee please if anyone has tried the same scenario?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have looked at the default scenario file which is present in the
>>> sip-stress package but that emulates the same node as both caller and
>>> callee.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Junaid
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clearwater mailing list
>>> Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clearwater mailing list
>>> Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Clearwater mailing list
>>> Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
Clearwater@lists.projectclearwater.org
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/mailman/listinfo/clearwater_lists.projectclearwater.org

Reply via email to