On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:12:33 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Clean up five more tests. >> >> test/jdk/javax/swing/JDesktopPane/4132993/bug4132993.java >> test/jdk/javax/swing/JDesktopPane/4773378/bug4773378.java >> test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/4325606/bug4325606.java >> test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/4330998/bug4330998.java >> test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/4694598/FrameContent.html >> test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/4694598/bug4694598.java > > test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/4694598/bug4694598.java line 29: > >> 27: * @summary JEditor pane throws NullPointerException on mouse movement. >> 28: * @library ../../regtesthelpers >> 29: * @build JRobot > > The test doesn't seem to use any of the extended functionality provided by > JRobot, so the standard `java.awt.Robot` can be used instead. I do not see any harm in using JRobot, it is a Swing test after all. > test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/4694598/bug4694598.java line 40: > >> 38: >> 39: public class bug4694598 { >> 40: JFrame frame = null; > > Suggestion: > > JFrame frame; > > `null` is the default value any way. Ok. > test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/4694598/bug4694598.java line 81: > >> 79: try { >> 80: Thread.sleep(50); >> 81: } catch (InterruptedException ex) {} > > Suggestion: > > jRobo.delay(50); Fixed. > test/jdk/javax/swing/JEditorPane/4694598/bug4694598.java line 93: > >> 91: >> 92: public static void main(String args[]) throws InterruptedException, >> 93: InvocationTargetException { > > Suggestion: > > public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { > > Java-style array declaration, shortened `throws` clause. Switched the array declaration but i would prefer to keep all the exceptions listed in the main method declaration. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18184#discussion_r1521142437 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18184#discussion_r1521141637 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18184#discussion_r1521139604 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18184#discussion_r1521136603