On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:18:25 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I believe it's unexpected because we don't expect `PropertyVetoException`, >> in which case failure seems a better option. >> >> If anything changes so that `PropertyVetoException` would be thrown all the >> time, the test would appear to be passing whereas it would not run at all. > > This is the only point with which I *disagree*. Right, I see no reason to catch anything unless it is known to sometimes happen and not be a problem. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18184#discussion_r1522052020
