On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Konrad Hinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As a first non-trivial exercice, I wrote an implementation of monads > in Clojure. I just uploaded it to the Group: > > http://clojure.googlegroups.com/web/monads.clj
This is pretty code. Did you just implement symbol-macro-let? Very nice. I noticed that you have a private function (monad-expr) used by a macro, and was about to comment that that doesn't work -- but your function is used by the macro, not the *expansion* of the macro, so it should work just fine. I'll have to keep that in mind. (zero? n) is an idiom for (= 0 n) Alas even your beautiful, succinct implementation and careful code comments are apparently insufficient for me to understand monads. I'll keep trying. :-) --Chouser --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
