On Nov 21, 2008, at 17:10, Chouser wrote: > This is pretty code. Did you just implement symbol-macro-let? > Very nice.
I just saw a reference to symbol-macrolet with a description. My function replace-syms is indeed very similar, the difference being that it takes a map for defining the substitutions to be done, instead of a let-like sequence. The difference is not just in syntax though, as expressions in symbol-macrolet can refer to earlier "bindings" (they aren't really bindings) whereas my replace-syms doesn't check for substitutions to be made inside other substitutions. But it would be fairly easy to implement symbol- macrolet on top of my replace-syms. Would that be something of interest to the Clojure community? Konrad. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
