On Dec 7, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Peter Wolf wrote:
> Shouldn't the number of processors on the test machine make a big > difference to how fast it runs? Whereas, the Java version is only > dependent on the clock rate of the individual processors. Replacing the "map" call with "pmap" on a 2 core machine improved my time by about 6% (the code was already keeping both cores pretty busy). On a 4 core machine it brought the time from 6.8 seconds down to 4.7. On the same 4 core machine, the Java version posted by the original poster runs in 1.3 seconds including JVM launch time. I tried use clojure.parallel's preduce as well, but on my 4 core machine it didn't affect the time. --Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
