Daniel, To be honest, the colours are the least important, much more relevant is that structures are recursed properly and that the base language is defined.
Let me know how you get on refining your mode and I'll have a look. When we have agreed on something I can update the jedit patch so we have the best superset in the editor. Does it sound like a plan? Kind Regards, David. 2008/12/12 Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> > > Which highlighting does it use? > > Daniel > > On Dec 12, 5:10 am, blackdog <black...@ipowerhouse.com> wrote: > > If anyone on this thread is interested I uploaded clj-jedit.tar.gz to > > the group file section on an incompletejeditplugin for clojure. It > > has the hilighting, repl, and namespace browser (courtesy of enclojure) > > - anyone want to take it on and improve it, I don't have time right > > now?? It was based on the scheme plugin. > > > > bd > > > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:30:37 -0800 (PST) > > > > > > > > Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I merged in all the interesting stuff from David Moss's ClojurejEdit > > > mode. We do highlight things in very different colors, but all of the > > > elements that his recognizes are also recognized by mine now. Also, I > > > fixed the annoying issue with def: > > > > > (def this)(def that) > > > > > The above now highlights correctly. > > > > > Feedback is welcome. I'm certainly willing to change the way things > > > are highlighted, add highlighting or remove it. > > > > > Daniel > > > > > On Dec 11, 2:58 pm, Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, just saw this thread. I had made some modifications to the > > > > > edit mode and uploaded it for inclusion (as a patch) > > > > > here: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2201893&grou... . > > > > > > > I haven't checked the status in a while as my internet is very > > > > > intermittent ATM. Please let me know if there is anything missing > > > > > from it or if I can in any way enhance the mode. > > > > > > I'll have to take a closer look at your new version. We probably > > > > should merge our efforts. Your mode does do some things that mine > > > > doesn't, and it doesn't really benefit anyone to have three > > > > competing Clojure modes. :-) My mode is pretty convoluted in the > > > > way it uses some <RULES/> tricks to highlight things like (def > > > > blah), so it's probably easier if I steal your improvements and > > > > merge them into mine. I'll give that a try later today and post > > > > back with the results. > > > > > > Daniel > > > > -- > > None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they > > are free — Goethe > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
