I've had a really quick look at your mode, it looks good, and I like the regularity in keyword highlighting. I'm going to have a proper look sometime later on the weekend and will get back to you when I have done.
Kind Regards, David. 2008/12/12 Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> > > Sounds like a good plan. :-) At the moment, I think that what's in > the mode is pretty solid, meaning I don't have anything planned to > refine it further. (except for regexp syntax, which I don't know > anything about) So, if you want to evaluate it now, that'd be great! > > As a minor aside, I don't actually recursively parse S-expressions. > It's not a bad idea, but jEdit's weird treatment of eager-vs-lazy > matching sometimes gets in the way. Instead, I just define <SEQ > TYPE="OPERATOR">(</SEQ> and <SEQ TYPE="OPERATOR">)</SEQ>. I don't > really know when I'm in an S-exp, but I don't think that's too much of > a limitation. The only exception to the above is my highlighting of > "blah" in (def blah 123). That's done with an EOL_SPAN_REGEXP which > delegates to a new ruleset. This ruleset then in turn delegates back > to main in the case where the S-exp is closed prior to the end-of- > line. It's not a normal idiom for jEdit highlighting modes, but it > seems to work fine. At least I didn't have to resort to *really* > bizarre tricks like I did in my SASyLF and ReST modes (opening a SPAN > that terminates on an assumed non-existent character, etc). > > Daniel > > On Dec 12, 1:15 pm, "David Moss" <dsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Daniel, > > > > To be honest, the colours are the least important, much more relevant is > > that structures are recursed properly and that the base language is > defined. > > > > Let me know how you get on refining your mode and I'll have a look. When > we > > have agreed on something I can update the jedit patch so we have the best > > superset in the editor. > > > > Does it sound like a plan? > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > David. > > > > 2008/12/12 Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > Which highlighting does it use? > > > > > Daniel > > > > > On Dec 12, 5:10 am, blackdog <black...@ipowerhouse.com> wrote: > > > > If anyone on this thread is interested I uploaded clj-jedit.tar.gz to > > > > the group file section on an incompletejeditplugin for clojure. It > > > > has the hilighting, repl, and namespace browser (courtesy of > enclojure) > > > > - anyone want to take it on and improve it, I don't have time right > > > > now?? It was based on the scheme plugin. > > > > > > bd > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:30:37 -0800 (PST) > > > > > > Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I merged in all the interesting stuff from David Moss's > ClojurejEdit > > > > > mode. We do highlight things in very different colors, but all of > the > > > > > elements that his recognizes are also recognized by mine now. > Also, I > > > > > fixed the annoying issue with def: > > > > > > > (def this)(def that) > > > > > > > The above now highlights correctly. > > > > > > > Feedback is welcome. I'm certainly willing to change the way > things > > > > > are highlighted, add highlighting or remove it. > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > On Dec 11, 2:58 pm, Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, just saw this thread. I had made some modifications to the > > > > > > > edit mode and uploaded it for inclusion (as a patch) > > > > > > > here: > > >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2201893&grou... > . > > > > > > > > > I haven't checked the status in a while as my internet is very > > > > > > > intermittent ATM. Please let me know if there is anything > missing > > > > > > > from it or if I can in any way enhance the mode. > > > > > > > > I'll have to take a closer look at your new version. We probably > > > > > > should merge our efforts. Your mode does do some things that > mine > > > > > > doesn't, and it doesn't really benefit anyone to have three > > > > > > competing Clojure modes. :-) My mode is pretty convoluted in > the > > > > > > way it uses some <RULES/> tricks to highlight things like (def > > > > > > blah), so it's probably easier if I steal your improvements and > > > > > > merge them into mine. I'll give that a try later today and post > > > > > > back with the results. > > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > -- > > > > None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they > > > > are free — Goethe > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
