> I appreciate your desire to contribute, but Clojure is not just about > your needs. You have flooded the group with every idea you have, some > are bugs (important), some are good ideas, some not, but there are > simply too many to address at the rate you are producing them.
OK, I am sorry. I know I have made at least one misguided post, and a few quibbles about relatively minor things, but by and large I thought I was being helpful. I have tried to meter out my posts, and focus on issues of broader use to the community, but I guess I am failing on both counts and will have to try harder. > I'd advise you to be more patient, build up a small library of helper > functions you use frequently, make contributions of the most important > of them to contrib. Clojure doesn't change that fast and it's not > going to. I like to consider things and I can't address every > suggestion as it is made. Fair enough. > Separate out the important things (like potential bugs) so they get > more attention. > > As for these: > > - 0-arg distinct? returns true, not an exception (so (apply distinct? > nil) = true) > > Not now, will consider. > > - rewrite concat so that (apply concat seq) doesn't evaluate the > first three elements of seq > > No, may fall out of streams work. > > - make every?, not-every?, some, not-any? take multiple seq args like > map, i.e., (every? not= [1 2 3] [2 3 4]) > > No. > > - allow arguments to merge-with after the first to be lists of > pairs. > > No. OK, thanks. -Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
