Hi, Rich Hickey a écrit : > I am looking for feedback from people willing to read and understand > the linked-to documentation and the fully lazy model, and especially > from those trying the lazy branch code and porting some of your own. > I just ported Enlive (http://github.com/cgrand/enlive/commit/3245678e6ae0a82152dbf4a6fb8916d2514b60dd): * found/replaced rest by next and rrest by nnext, * no broken nil punnings (!) but several calls to seq? that could be rewritten in a less brittle way, * no metadata on sequence, is this an oversight? or is this related to the lack of metadata on closures? (I'm willing to work on this.)
I'll quickly get over my imperative interpretation of 'next and I trust in your naming skills: if first/next/fine is the best option, go with it. Christophe -- Professional: http://cgrand.net/ (fr) On Clojure: http://clj-me.blogspot.com/ (en) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
