You're right, of course, but in life compromises must happen. If Rich proceeds *with no regard* for Pragmatic's needs, they have a recourse which is simply no Clojure book. Or a Clojure book that has broken examples.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:34 AM, wlr <geeked...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Regarding Programming Clojure: > > I think that placing the burden of "book vs actual" incompatibility > upon Rich is misplaced. If anything, pressure from the Clojure > community should be placed on the Pragmatic Programmers to allow > Stuart to "do the right thing" regarding when the book is released, > viz., when Clojure has stabilized. > > Realize who is making the open contribution and who is profiting from > that contribution and keep the priorities straight. > > My 2 cents. > > Walt > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
