On 26 Jul 2017, at 13:53, Alex Miller wrote: > This effort is really about working on the problem of creating JVM classpaths > and was not really intended to extend to cljs. Perhaps it could be (but I'm > not sure where or why that would be useful).
If node modules were declared with a type of `:npm` that could lead to a nightmare of having mixed dependency type which wouldn't really make sense. If it was an archive/dependency of purely `*.cljc` files that could work as their platform independent, but arbitrary node packages would seem to the path of trouble. Mark --- "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — Mark Reinhold. Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://www.chaliceofblood.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
