On Mar 10, 10:03 am, Vincent Foley <vfo...@gmail.com> wrote: > With Clojure you don't need to understand Monads. And I don't think > they're hard to understand, I think they're hard to come to grips with > because of what they are capable of. > > Anyway, I hope you enjoy Clojure :) Yes, I know, but I'd like to understand them anyway. Looks like a good way to avoid mutable state in my programs (along with other things). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- Static type guy trying to convert zoltar
- Re: Static type guy trying to convert Jason Wolfe
- Re: Static type guy trying to convert Timothy Pratley
- Re: Static type guy trying to convert Vincent Foley
- Re: Static type guy trying to convert mikel
- Re: Static type guy trying to convert CuppoJava
- Re: Static type guy trying to conve... zoltar
- Re: Static type guy trying to ... Vincent Foley
- Re: Static type guy trying... zoltar
- Re: Static type guy trying to convert Jon Harrop
- Re: Static type guy trying to convert Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: Static type guy trying to conve... e
- Re: Static type guy trying to ... Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: Static type guy trying to ... mikel
- Re: Static type guy trying... Laurent PETIT
- Re: Static type guy trying to ... Jon Harrop
- Re: Static type guy trying to ... Jay Fields
- Re: Static type guy trying to conve... ntu...@googlemail.com