On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 19:28, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, and following the tradition of clojure.java.io, you'll probably > want to name it clojure.java.string, since it relies heavily on > interop.
If bits of Java poke through the public interface, yes. This is certainly the case for clojure.java.io. But, I can't see a reason the public interface of something as simple and well-understood as strings needs to be host-platform specific. I wouldn't want to see the string library shunted off into the java-only ghetto without good reason. // ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
