2010/7/10 Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> > Hello Laurent, > > Am 09.07.2010 um 18:30 schrieb Laurent PETIT: > > > But still I prefer to have the library name at the end of the namespace, > it's easier to spot than in the middle (e.g. I prefer net.cgrand.parsley to > paredit.core) > > Now that is a strange argument. net.cgrand.parsley vs. parsley.api. Why > should at the end be easier to spot than at the beginning? In particular > because parsley.api just contains relevant information while > net.cgrand.parsley contains quite a bit of noise. I consider the origin to > be noise in the code. Of course it is a fact with some weight when > evaluating a library whether it was written by Christophe. But in the code > this is completely of no relevance. > > I'm not talking about what the prefix should be. I didn't compare it to the "most relevant part" of the name being in the first segment, but in the middle ^^^
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
