I guess much of this comes down to style. I find xml-http-request easier to read and consistent with the english language practice of using hyphens to join words in compound modifiers.
But my point regarding XMLHttpRequest was regarding the seemingly arbitrary and difficult to remember (for me at least) uppercasing of the letters in XMLHttpRequest. That choice seems no more valid than XMLHTTPRequest or XmlHttpRequest, all of which I find much harder on the eyes, and more difficult to type, than xml-http-request. Cyrus On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Mark Engelberg wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Cyrus Harmon <cyrushar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> XMLHttpRequest vs. xml-http-request. I rest my case. > > I'm not even sure what case you're making, let alone what side you're > "resting" for. :-/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
