On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Isaac Gouy <igo...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Is there any point speculating about this as outsiders? > > It was available - Data.HashTable seems to be copyright 2003. > > http://ogi.altocumulus.org/~hallgren/Programatica/tools/pfe.cgi?Data.HashTable
Huh ? point ? it was just a casual comment, no point was intended. And I have read some comments by Don that what is in the shoutout is way faster than Data.HashTable > > >> And Data.HashTable also use some mutable array thing so it is still not >> the idiomatic Haskell of everything is immutable. > > afaict idiomatic is everything referentially transparent not > everything immutable, as in - "I needed a halfway decent mutable > collection type – having a properly tested mutable collection that > actually performs well would be a godsend." > how can you assure that(let's put aside the under the hood things where it is done in C) if you break the assumption that value can be changed. BTW, it seems that to verteran Haskellers, the speed of Data.HashTable is not a concern to them as they said they don't see the need of that(mutable hasktable) in their usage. There seems to be a bug(as in it is slow) filed for this package for quite a while but no one even bother to attempt to improve it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
