On Sep 10, 2:22 pm, gary ng <garyng2...@gmail.com> wrote: -snip- > My initial comment was all about 'it seems that Haskell submission is > not the typical elegant form' and to me because of the specific you > want to measure, there is no acceptable elegant Haskell form.
So what are we to do when there's a problem that has "no acceptable elegant Haskell form"? > > Does it actually say that the hashtable updates have to be > > destructive? > > If want to go that route, be my guest. I don't understand what you mean, didn't you say - it must be a mutable hashtable? Why couldn't it be a hashtable that copied values? > Indeed. Your benchmark suite are very specific about how certain > things must be done in order to measure a specific aspect you want to > measure. The other complaint is that it's not specific enough and allows too much play, with programs in one language being too different to programs in other languages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
