On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:26:49 +0100 > Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: >> http://clojure.googlegroups.com/web/AreWeThereYet.pdf > > Thanks for the link. > > To bad it made Tufte kill a kitten. I had forgotten there was a > textual representation with a lower information density per bit than > video.
Did you mean a higher information density per bit? The key concepts can no doubt be conveyed in a few tens of KB of html and still images -- under a megabyte, certainly. Compare that to the larger size of a pdf, and the still larger size of video of any decent quality and resolution. The information density is higher for the more compact representation of the same key information; the rest is, in effect, anti-compressed. It may add some side channel information that was otherwise lack -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
