On 17 January 2012 22:10, Dennis Haupt <d.haup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > in the end, the program must work down to the lowest level and there > cannot be unanswered questions. but take a look at the 3 solutions given > until now. in 2 cases, all i read is "do this, then that, i don't care > how". in the third, a hashset was picked. but it didn't have to be one. > any non-map-collection type would have worked here.
I'm not sure I entirely follow you... It's probably true that some people overcomplicate problems, but I don't think this is a side-effect of experience, assuming that is what you're implying. In my experience, it's the other way round: simplicity tends to come with experience. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
