Sorry, I certainly didn't intend to start such a heated debate ;o) Hopefully some of you appreciate the link but you're all free to ignore. The truth is, no matter the media, there are too many interesting things and you need to choose. I had this video in my todo list for a week before I took the time to watch it. After that, I thought it was kind of special and worth sharing, any textual representation would betray its essence in my opinion.
2012/2/24 Andy Fingerhut <andy.finger...@gmail.com> > Perhaps someone will volunteer to transcribe it and post that. You know, > maybe someone who can type quickly and prefers text. :-) > > I've done that for one of Rich's earlier talks posted as video. It takes > time, and I'm not volunteering for this one. > > Andy > > On Feb 24, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Cedric Greevey wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Daniel E. Renfer <duck112...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 02/24/2012 02:42 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote: > >>> OK. I googled the group archives. Seems there was a Ken Wesson active > >>> on the list for a while, but he disappeared a couple of months before > >>> I joined. I'm not sure why people think I might be him. > >> > >> Ken Wesson was noted for having strong opinions as was a noted hater of > >> videos where text will do. > > > > Most of us on this list probably have strong opinions -- it tends to > > go with the territory of being smarter than the average bear. As for > > hating videos where text will do, need I repeat my list of bullet > > points again? It's quite *obvious*. It's no more surprising for > > multiple techies to find videos-where-text-will-do to be a troubling > > trend than for techies to find that Lisps and even Algols are nicer > > languages to program large systems in than Visual Basic. :) Especially > > since we techies are very used to using search tools and other things > > specifically geared around finding *text*, and often have multiple > > devices including mobile where bandwidth costs can quickly become > > exorbitant. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- Damien Lepage http://damienlepage.com @damienlepage <https://twitter.com/#!/damienlepage> linkedin.com/in/damienlepage <http://www.linkedin.com/in/damienlepage> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
