On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:17:16 PM UTC+1, Luc wrote: > > There's no magic. You cannot win on all fronts. >
You defeatist, you :) I'm just trying to represent the enthusiastic perspective where "if it *could* be better, it *must* be better". In many respects Clojure already embodies exactly that attitude, that's why we all love it. Maybe some people here feel defensive about the criticism of Clojure's performance from those who have nowhere near the complete picture; that can't be helped, I guess, it's the inescapable nature of such public communication. Still, the complacent tone that often comes out rubs me the wrong way. Don't get me wrong; over the years I have progressed from being in love with Clojure towards it becoming my home sweet home; in your home you take all great things for granted and spend time worrying about those little details that could be made better. -Marko -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
