> I personally think the CL feature expression approach is satisfactory.
The more I think about it, the less I think that the CL Feature Expression approach is satisfactory as is. I'm now reasonably convinced that, horror of horrors, we should look to the C preprocessor for inspiration. CL's approach only provides flags, not key/value pairs. Also, the CL approach does not provide a structured form for if/else or cond expressions and has only limited and/or/not predicate combinators. Experience in writing portable C code has proven that == and >= are important for checking version numbers and feature levels. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
