IMHO features expressions should be evaluated at read-time only.
Putting it off till the compilation phase only complicates things.
So I'm actually favoring a preprocessing step like here -
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Feature+Expressions?focusedCommentId=6390066#comment-6390066

The idea is simple; when the reader parses a sexpr, and if there's a
feature expression,then  only use the part that's relevant to the current
Clojure dialect.
The only complication with this scheme is that all information in
*clojure-version* is related to the version numbers only; however, this
could be changed easily.



On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Brent Millare <brent.mill...@gmail.com>wrote:

> +1
>
> Isn't is possible to accomplish all these efforts using tagged literals?
> https://github.com/miner/wilkins
>
> This way the facilities for read-time code generation can be customized
> and any reader that supports tagged-literals will support this. All of this
> is data provided as arguments, no evaluation. Evaluation happens from the
> tag function.
>
> On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 8:24:15 PM UTC-5, Brian Goslinga wrote:
>>
>> Do we really need new syntax for feature expressions? Although it would
>> be more ugly than CL's feature expressions, we could use a reader literal.
>> For example #feature [<feature expression> <value>]. Using a reader literal
>> is simple, compatible with EDN, and allows for the feature expressions to
>> be backported to an older version of Clojure using a library.
>
>  --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
Akhil Wali

# http://github.com/darth10 <https://github.com/darth10>
# http://darth10.github.com

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to